2012 – 11/24 GA Notes

Minutes of Occupy Maine Bath/Brunswick region General Assembly, November 24, 2012

Present:

Barbara West, Drew Joy, Susan Chandel, Christine DeTroy, Joe de Rivera, Jim Friedlander, Chris Winn, Selma Sternlieb, Michael Wetmore, Alex Briggs

Facilitator: Barbara
Recorder: Selma
Announcements:
Walmart Black Friday Demonstrations:
Drew reported that he participated in a flash mob at the Scarborough Walmart. You can see pictures of it at the Southern Maine Workers Center website, MaineWorkers.org. Selma reported that Julie, Karen, Phui Yi, Anita, Cathy, Mike White and she were at Walmart distributing leaflets. Everyone was asked to leave. Selma gave the rest of the leaflets to Barbara. A big thank you to Julie for producing the leaflets!
Banking:
Joe reported that he talked to the manager of Bank of America who said she couldn’t comment on anything. She told him to call the bank’s PR person.
Citizens United:
Joe urged us to contact Angus King and request a meeting. He wants Angus to work on requiring disclosure of campaign contributions. Angus is on record as opposed to Citizens United. Alex noted that Angus is likely to disregard our interests. Ten states have voted in favor of an amendment to the Constitution.
Occupied by Art:
There will be an open mike night at Susan’s on Saturday, December 1 at 4 p.m. Musicians, poets and others can speak. Susan reported that Mapledge was on Maine Things Considered talking about foreclosure.
Creditors’ Meeting:
Susan reported that a meeting will be held in Portland on Monday at 11 a.m. to determine if the company that has been formed (Mapledge Collective) can pay off the mortgage. Chris, who is the president of the the company, believes that it’s in the best interest of the bank to accept the plan. The bankruptcy judge, or referee as he’s called, will make the determination.
Progressive Holiday Party:
We’re talking about going to the Addams Melman House from 2-4 on Dec. 9, and then going on to Susan’s. It was suggested that we bring entrees or salads to the AMH and desserts to Susan’s.
Letters to the Editor:
Kevin Twine had a letter in the Portland paper on health care. Joe had a letter in the Forecaster on Move to Amend.
Town Council:
The councilors may say that rescinding Citizens United is not a local issue. Jim commented that it is a local issue because a big box store company that wants to move to Brunswick could try to influence how the town council votes by putting a lot of money into a candidate’s campaign.
Discussion:
Corporations in Politics:
Barbara feels that there are plenty of groups working on the narrow issue of amending the Constitution. Our goal should be to educate people about the role of corporations in politics. Changing Citizens United doesn’t change the fact that we have no economic democracy. Drew remarked that concentrating on Citizens United is short sighted. Joe feels that we should lobby Angus on the issue of corporate control of politics. Thomas Jefferson believed that corporations are dangerous and need to be controlled.
Collectivizing Our Power:
Alex thinks we should read the same website(s?) as a way to empower ourselves. (I’m not sure I got that right.)
Agenda for Next Week:
We want to talk about cooperative economy vs. corporate economy.
Thanks to Larry Scott:
We decided we want to thank Larry Scott, owner of the store where we meet every week, for his generosity in letting us use the space. Barbara will contact Anita about making some kind of fancy card that we can all sign.
Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to 2012 – 11/24 GA Notes

  1. Anonymous says:

    Here’s the facebook response I received from Angus King re: Citizens United. Looks like he IS in support of the Disclose Act. Julie Keller Pease (email rec’d 11/25/12)
    “Citizens United was one of the worst decisions in the Supreme Court’s history; unfortunately, it now frames the economic reality of campaigns. While I support the idea of a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United, I know that the feasibility of such action may be limited. What we can do in the interim is to require transparency in funding and real-time, mandated disclosure of who is contributing money. One of the first steps Congress can take to rectify this situation is pass the DISCLOSE Act, which would require the disclosure of the flow of money in elections.” November 20 at 9:45am ·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s